case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all be certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or girl never approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Reduce off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these kinds of an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then find further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Every along with the same shall be stored from the police station for the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance in check here the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.